FAQ

Nasaq Partners is a senior-led advisory firm that helps GCC organisations turn strategy into results. We focus on governance, operating models, transformation delivery, PMO effectiveness, performance reporting and AI readiness. Clients work with us when execution slows or major programmes need more clarity and structure.

We provide governance frameworks, Board support, strategy clarification, operating model design, execution support, PMO setup, portfolio governance, KPI design, reporting, AI strategy, AI roadmaps, cybersecurity governance, ERP programme oversight and ISO-readiness work.

Yes. Most strategies are clear. The challenge is execution. We help leaders create decision clarity, governance, reporting and delivery structures so the strategy turns into real progress.

We strengthen them. We clarify roles, simplify reporting, improve coordination and build internal capability. We do not replace your PMO. We make it more effective.

Internal teams know the organisation well but often lack the time, method or senior perspective required for complex transformation. We bring structure, alignment and decision clarity that accelerates progress.

Yes. Many clients contact us once a strategy is complete and execution becomes difficult. We turn plans into practical roadmaps, decision paths, KPIs and delivery rhythms that work.

No. We simplify governance by clarifying who decides, what is reviewed and what information leaders need. Governance becomes faster and more useful.

Boards, CEOs, Executive Committees, CIOs, COOs, Chief Transformation Officers, Strategy Directors, PMO Heads and leaders of major programmes. Clients usually run multi-entity portfolios or mission-critical initiatives.

Yes. We work with ministries, authorities, sovereign funds and national programmes. These environments require strong coordination, accurate reporting and reliable delivery.

We conduct Board assessments, clarify decision rights, design KPI frameworks, support oversight processes and deliver alignment workshops. We also improve reporting so Boards receive clear and reliable information.

Yes. We design KPIs that reflect reality, support decisions and align with strategy. We remove vanity metrics and ensure leaders see information that matters.

Yes. We build value models that estimate benefits, timelines and risks. This gives leaders a clear view of where to invest and what to pause.

Yes. Many use cases do not need perfect data. We identify where data quality matters and where it does not. We focus on opportunities that can deliver value with what you already have.

Yes. AI readiness begins with clarity on use cases, value and requirements. We help define a roadmap and structure so investment decisions are grounded and realistic.

No. We provide strategy, governance, value modelling and operating model support. Technical implementation is handled by internal teams or vendors. We ensure the work produces results.

We structure the programme, define decision paths, align stakeholders, manage risks and ensure the ERP stays linked to business priorities. We do not configure systems. We de-risk the programme.

We focus on ownership, scope discipline, change management, readiness and early issue escalation. Most ERP failures come from unclear requirements or misalignment. We fix these first.

Yes. We support cybersecurity assessments, governance, programme structuring, policy development, capability building and reporting. We help leadership understand risks in clear terms.

We define structures, roles, risk processes and reporting. We help align IT, security and business teams so cybersecurity becomes a controlled part of operations rather than a technical silo.

Yes. We prepare organisations for standards like ISO 27001, ISO 22301, ISO 20000 and ISO 9001. We clarify requirements, review gaps, design processes and support audit preparation. We do not perform the audit.

Yes. We align priorities across entities, design unified reporting, set shared KPIs and build governance that works across organisations. This is common in sovereign ecosystems and public-sector groups.

We clarify priorities, redesign operating rhythms, streamline reporting, align teams and create clear ownership. We build structures that make progress predictable rather than reactive.

We diagnose the root causes of delays, reset priorities, rebuild governance, redesign reporting and establish a delivery rhythm that restores momentum. Leaders usually see improvement within weeks.

Most organisations see clearer reporting and faster decisions within four to six weeks. Larger results depend on the scope of work.

No. We reinforce them by building capability, simplifying processes and improving coordination. The goal is independent internal ownership once we exit.

We integrate into existing processes, reduce workload and remove bottlenecks. Team confidence increases because decisions become clearer and work becomes easier to manage.

Yes. We tailor governance, reporting and delivery rhythms to leadership expectations, decision-making habits and internal dynamics.

We often work on-site for alignment, assessments and delivery. Remote work is used for analytics, reviews and updates. The mix depends on what creates value.

Most engagements last three to nine months. Large transformations or ERP and cybersecurity programmes can extend further. Short diagnostic engagements are available for leaders who need clarity quickly.

We work in the public sector, sovereign funds, financial services, energy, infrastructure, defence-adjacent industries and large private groups.

Clearer priorities, faster decisions, stronger governance, improved reporting, more predictable delivery, reduced programme risk, better cybersecurity posture, smoother ERP execution and AI initiatives tied to measurable value.

We begin with a short conversation about priorities or challenges. From there, we propose a focused assessment or intervention that gives leaders clarity and a practical path forward.