When investors struggle to understand your group structure

The group structure fits on one slide. The investor's questions continue for an hour.

The chart shows ownership, but it does not explain which company holds the customer contract, where the intellectual property sits or how cash reaches the entity seeking investment. Those relationships may be familiar internally and difficult for an outsider to reconstruct.

An investor readiness review should make the operating and financial relationships understandable before the transaction timetable becomes demanding.

Connect the chart to the business

For the material entities, explain their purpose, activities and relationship to the proposed investment. Identify important assets, contractual obligations and sources of revenue. Distinguish the legal position from management's intended future structure.

Consider an illustrative group in which one entity employs the technical team, another signs customer agreements and a third owns the software. An investor considering an interest in the customer-facing company will ask how that company secures the people and rights required to operate.

The answer belongs in documented arrangements supported by the relevant legal and tax advice. A verbal assurance that the companies are all part of the same group is unlikely to resolve the question.

Explain the movement of cash

Show how operating cash is generated and transferred, including significant intercompany balances and funding arrangements. Explain restrictions and dependencies relevant to the proposed transaction without assuming that cash held anywhere in the group is freely available everywhere else.

Finance should reconcile the entity-level information with the consolidated view. If management uses adjusted performance measures, provide definitions and an explanation of significant adjustments.

Also identify guarantees and other commitments that could affect the entity being considered. Their significance depends on the actual agreements and the financial position of the parties involved.

Resolve uncertainty before polishing the presentation

Maintain a list of unanswered questions, the specialist responsible and the evidence needed. Distinguish a missing document from an arrangement that has never been agreed. They require different work.

Decide which matters need to be resolved before discussions with investors and which can be presented transparently as outstanding. Avoid describing a planned restructuring as complete.

A useful test is to give an informed colleague the structure chart and a short explanation of how the business operates. If they cannot identify what the investor would own and what that entity depends on, revise the explanation and investigate the underlying arrangements.

Clarity will not remove every transaction issue. It lets both sides recognise the issues earlier and discuss them using the same facts.

Nasaq Partners works with a network of experts on governance, strategy and execution. Explore our advisory services.